Loading...

Postulate is the best way to take and share notes for classes, research, and other learning.

More info

Source notes

Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy

Profile picture of Samson ZhangSamson Zhang

Seymour Martin Lipset, The American Political Science Review , Mar., 1959, Vol. 53, No. 1 (Mar., 1959), pp. 69-105

Mar 22, 2022

Summary

Lipset affirms high correlations between economic development and democracy and forwards Lerner's theory that development causes democracy along with several ideas for how development moderates extremism and sustains democracy.

Notes

existing literature on conditions for democracy

  • ernest griffith: judeo-christian attitudes => democratic institutions
    • opponents point to fascist italy and germany
  • lipset criticizes lack of perspective, data in these analyses

methodology

  • binary divide countries into democracies and dictatorships
  • wealth, industrialization, urbanization and education as indices of economic development
  • economic development strongly correlated with democracies

Lerner's theory of development => democratization

  • urbanization => literacy => media growth => institutions of democracy, i.e. voting

Lipset's ideas on why development is good for democracy

  • more impoverished lower class => more likely to revolt, so it makes sense that general wealth placates the lower class into accepting the necessary gradualism of democracy
  • large middle class: reward moderate, penalize extremist groups
  • upper class: has more respect for lower class if they are less impoverished, less incentive to try and gain absolute power because of decrease in marginal utility if they are wealthier
  • Tocqueville: "mass society" of organizations independent of central state power necessary to sustain democracy => wealth allows these organizations to exist

Lipset on legitimacy

  • Democracy more secure if conservative groups and symbols retained
  • For example 10/12 European democracies are monarchies (as of paper publication in 1959)
  • Test of legitimacy: is there a common political culture, symbols across parties? like Founding Fathers, Lincoln in America => if different parties don't recognize each other's symbols, then sign of lack of legitimacy
  • Regime legitimacy affects stability more than effectiveness

Other random things

  • stable democracy depends on groups, individuals having cross-cutting political affiliations
  • Federalism, multi-party systems strengthen democracy if they divide across common bodies and not ethnic, religious, linguistic lines
  • stable mid-20th century democracies are "post-politics", little difference between left and right

Comments (loading...)

Sign in to comment

Poli 5: Intro to Comparative Politics

Notes for Pomona class Poli 005: Intro to Comparative Politics